YouTube names explicit consent as a formal answer to an AI likeness claim
Casting from a cleared library gives you the named consent a claim like this asks a creator to produce, before the question is even raised.
You make the AI content. When a face turns out never to have been cleared, the claim tends to land on you. Consentique is one cleared library you cast from for every client, where each asset carries its own consent record, so the work you ship holds up to review. Likeness, licensed at the source.
I SAID YESYou produce for brands. A creative director hands you a brief on Monday and wants the films by Friday, in five markets, cut for every format. You generate the people, you deliver, you move to the next job.
Then a face you used turns out to have been shot under a release written for retouching, not for generating. The letter arrives, and it arrives at the producer as readily as the brand. You held the tools that made the image, so you hold a share of the exposure. The client asked for volume and speed, and the one thing nobody put a number on was whether the person in the frame agreed.
Consentique is the asset library and marketplace where real, named people license their face for AI. You cast from that library once and reuse it across every client, and each asset arrives with a consent record built to clear legal review. What you deliver is not a face you hope was cleared. It is a face with the record attached, so the ground under the campaign is already sound.
Clear a face once and you use that same licensed cast on the next brief, and the one after. You are not clearing a person again for every job or trusting a fresh release each time.
Each licensed face carries the record of its own consent, naming the scope, the purpose, the duration and the pay. When the record moves with the asset, you deliver the answer to the duty rather than reaching for it after the fact.
Because the library is cleared before you cast from it, moving fast and moving safely become one action. A brief that changes on Friday is remade the same day, on people who already agreed, with no new clearance to chase.
The duty to label AI generated people is arriving at the advert itself. A cast whose status is recorded at the source gives you a clean basis for the disclosure your client's advert now carries.
People often assume getting consent means slowing everything down. It doesn't have to.
People decide how their likeness can be used before it enters the library. Every approved image comes with a clear record of permission, ready before any creative work begins.
When it's time to create, everything is already in place. Creative teams move quickly, legal teams have the confidence they need, and campaigns stay on schedule.
The fastest way to work should also be the safest.
Look, market, language, age, format. Every face in the result is already cleared for that use and that market, so what you cast is what you can ship, on the deadline you are working to.








Clear a face once and use that same licensed cast on the next brief, and the one after.
Cast here, produce in the tools you already run, with the record attached to every asset.
Each asset carries a consent record your client's legal team can sign off, ready to hand over.
Simple per licence pricing that works across clients, so you can plan a job and mark it up cleanly.
Browse real people who have already agreed to AI use. Filter by the look, market and format you need.
Each person sets their own price and conditions. Their permission travels with every image or video you create.
Every asset comes with a clear record of permission, so your client knows it's ready to use. If the brief changes, create new versions without starting the approval process again.
The way a face is used has changed, and the version that clears is the one that agreed. Cast from a library built around the yes, carry the record into every delivery, and hand your clients work that holds up.
Casting from a cleared library gives you the named consent a claim like this asks a creator to produce, before the question is even raised.
Disclosure is arriving at delivery, and a record of consent at the source is what your client's disclosure rests on.
Stronger personal rights mean the record of consent becomes the thing that keeps delivery clear.
The duty reaches the party that made the content, so a cleared library keeps your delivery on solid ground.
A patchwork of state rights makes one cleared library easier to defend than a fresh release each job.
When consent becomes the story, casting from cleared, agreed people is what keeps your work above it.
The same consent question is being tested across likeness, and what clears a campaign is a record naming what was agreed. Consentique licenses the face with that record attached.
The duty reaches the producer too, so casting from a cleared library keeps you clear as you deliver.